<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: …And he believes that Fluoride in the water is a government attempt at mind control. Are Conspiracy Theories a Deal Breaker?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eharmony.com/blog/2011/04/25/%E2%80%A6and-he-believes-that-fluoride-in-the-water-is-a-government-attempt-at-mind-control-are-conspiracy-theories-a-deal-beaker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eharmony.com/blog/2011/04/25/%e2%80%a6and-he-believes-that-fluoride-in-the-water-is-a-government-attempt-at-mind-control-are-conspiracy-theories-a-deal-beaker/</link>
	<description>eHarmony experts’ take on dating, relationships and the science of love</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:53:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garth</title>
		<link>http://www.eharmony.com/blog/2011/04/25/%e2%80%a6and-he-believes-that-fluoride-in-the-water-is-a-government-attempt-at-mind-control-are-conspiracy-theories-a-deal-beaker/#comment-2169</link>
		<dc:creator>Garth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 19:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advice.eharmony.com/blog/?p=8276#comment-2169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People believe in conspiracy theories for one simple reason (whether they realize it or not)- it gives them a feeling of superiority. They like the idea that they &#039;know something&#039; that most people do not. They are impossible to reason with because while always demanding proof, they instantly reject all proof offered as &#039;fake&#039; or &#039;a smokescreen&#039; or &#039;that&#039;s just what they want you to believe&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People believe in conspiracy theories for one simple reason (whether they realize it or not)- it gives them a feeling of superiority. They like the idea that they &#8216;know something&#8217; that most people do not. They are impossible to reason with because while always demanding proof, they instantly reject all proof offered as &#8216;fake&#8217; or &#8216;a smokescreen&#8217; or &#8216;that&#8217;s just what they want you to believe&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monique</title>
		<link>http://www.eharmony.com/blog/2011/04/25/%e2%80%a6and-he-believes-that-fluoride-in-the-water-is-a-government-attempt-at-mind-control-are-conspiracy-theories-a-deal-beaker/#comment-2112</link>
		<dc:creator>Monique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 00:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advice.eharmony.com/blog/?p=8276#comment-2112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enjoy critical thinking, and I like to have fun with being analytical and looking at issues. But as with anything in life....everything has to have its place and time.  If this is all someone spoke about, I would be running the other way.  

The difference in my opinion between whether someone has paranoia or if they just like talking conspiracy, is that someone who has paranoia focuses on these issues, believes them as true and nothing the other person says opens up their mind to other explanations.  People with paranoia also talk about it all the time, and the conversation is about their thoughts.....and they do not engage others for their views.

By the  3rd date.......I personally would have red flags if all my date talked about was conspiracy theories.  Cereal and mind control would send a red flag for me that this date may have some paranoia issues, especially if he said it with a serious face and was adamant about it.   The race/class war would also send up a red flag to me as well.....sounds more like paranoia!

I personally would NOT continue to date someone who always talked and believed in conspiracy theories.  I am going to continue to eat my cereal! lol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy critical thinking, and I like to have fun with being analytical and looking at issues. But as with anything in life&#8230;.everything has to have its place and time.  If this is all someone spoke about, I would be running the other way.  </p>
<p>The difference in my opinion between whether someone has paranoia or if they just like talking conspiracy, is that someone who has paranoia focuses on these issues, believes them as true and nothing the other person says opens up their mind to other explanations.  People with paranoia also talk about it all the time, and the conversation is about their thoughts&#8230;..and they do not engage others for their views.</p>
<p>By the  3rd date&#8230;&#8230;.I personally would have red flags if all my date talked about was conspiracy theories.  Cereal and mind control would send a red flag for me that this date may have some paranoia issues, especially if he said it with a serious face and was adamant about it.   The race/class war would also send up a red flag to me as well&#8230;..sounds more like paranoia!</p>
<p>I personally would NOT continue to date someone who always talked and believed in conspiracy theories.  I am going to continue to eat my cereal! lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.eharmony.com/blog/2011/04/25/%e2%80%a6and-he-believes-that-fluoride-in-the-water-is-a-government-attempt-at-mind-control-are-conspiracy-theories-a-deal-beaker/#comment-2097</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 06:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advice.eharmony.com/blog/?p=8276#comment-2097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Granted, I wouldnt say that this guy is dangerous based on what&#039;s been stated above, he&#039;s just a bit off.  I&#039;d say that Doug&#039;s statement is well put.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted, I wouldnt say that this guy is dangerous based on what&#8217;s been stated above, he&#8217;s just a bit off.  I&#8217;d say that Doug&#8217;s statement is well put.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.eharmony.com/blog/2011/04/25/%e2%80%a6and-he-believes-that-fluoride-in-the-water-is-a-government-attempt-at-mind-control-are-conspiracy-theories-a-deal-beaker/#comment-2095</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 06:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advice.eharmony.com/blog/?p=8276#comment-2095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not a matter of honesty, its a matter of sanity and safety.  If someone is that out of touch with reality then you are placing yourself at potential risk by being around them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a matter of honesty, its a matter of sanity and safety.  If someone is that out of touch with reality then you are placing yourself at potential risk by being around them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shera</title>
		<link>http://www.eharmony.com/blog/2011/04/25/%e2%80%a6and-he-believes-that-fluoride-in-the-water-is-a-government-attempt-at-mind-control-are-conspiracy-theories-a-deal-beaker/#comment-2039</link>
		<dc:creator>shera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 13:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advice.eharmony.com/blog/?p=8276#comment-2039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grant,
I would thrilled that there was one thinking man around, ask him for coffee.
Shera]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grant,<br />
I would thrilled that there was one thinking man around, ask him for coffee.<br />
Shera</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Langston, Senior Director, Content</title>
		<link>http://www.eharmony.com/blog/2011/04/25/%e2%80%a6and-he-believes-that-fluoride-in-the-water-is-a-government-attempt-at-mind-control-are-conspiracy-theories-a-deal-beaker/#comment-2010</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Langston, Senior Director, Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 22:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advice.eharmony.com/blog/?p=8276#comment-2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FearlessCrusader, very interesting post. For the Record, eHarmony is not a Christian site. We&#039;re just a company and we serve people of all religions and no religion. 

Just to follow your thread, do you find that women are impressed when you bring up these varied theories or do they tend to back away?

thanks
Grant]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FearlessCrusader, very interesting post. For the Record, eHarmony is not a Christian site. We&#8217;re just a company and we serve people of all religions and no religion. </p>
<p>Just to follow your thread, do you find that women are impressed when you bring up these varied theories or do they tend to back away?</p>
<p>thanks<br />
Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FearlessCrusader</title>
		<link>http://www.eharmony.com/blog/2011/04/25/%e2%80%a6and-he-believes-that-fluoride-in-the-water-is-a-government-attempt-at-mind-control-are-conspiracy-theories-a-deal-beaker/#comment-2006</link>
		<dc:creator>FearlessCrusader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 22:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advice.eharmony.com/blog/?p=8276#comment-2006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This man is a perceptive, critical thinker - exactly what Marvel and Crackers are not.  Maseo has made excellent points which should be seriously considered.  Doug, you make a lot of sense and making headway fast but you&#039;re going the wrong direction.  Most conspiracy theories are a lot less fantastic than the official versions, which are highly improbable.  A few questions for you to ponder along these lines:  Re JFK, how unlikely are the &quot;magic bullet&quot; and &quot;pristine bullet&quot; theories promoted by the official Warren report?  Re RFK, how were more bullets fired than the assassin&#039;s gun held?  Re MLK, How did James Earl Ray shoot MLK with a tree in the way, why was that tree removed by the Parks Department immediately afterwards, and how was he convicted without a ballistics test ever being done to determine whether or not the fatal bullet was even shot from his rifle?  Re Oklahoma City, how is it that the FBI bomb people just happened to check into town the night before the bombing, and why did they swear they didn&#039;t get there until after the bombing?  Re 911, why did President Bush&#039;s brother order the bomb-sniffing dogs removed from the building from 9/9 through 9/11; how is it that the plane that flew through the Pentagon made only a small hole in the wall; and why did the coroner who was first on the scene at the supposed crash site of Flight 93 found no bodies or airplane parts?  Re Columbine, why does the official version insist there were only two perpetrators when the students themselves saw others, and I saw a whole group in black trenchcoats arrested on the sceene on live TV?  Re Abraham Lincoln, how is it that John Wilkes Booth was identified by his broken leg (broken when he jumped out of Lincoln&#039;s box onto the stage), but when he landed on the stage it was his OTHER leg that was broken?  It takes a lot more critical thinking to confront these discrepancies than to blindly believe whatever we are told.  And maybe somebody from eHarmony can tell me, if they&#039;re a Christian site, why don&#039;t they know that the All-seeing Eye of Horus is indeed an occult sysmbol?  I always heard that one of the primary purposes of public education was to cripple our ability to think for ourselves, and it&#039;s easy to see that this is exactly what has happened.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This man is a perceptive, critical thinker &#8211; exactly what Marvel and Crackers are not.  Maseo has made excellent points which should be seriously considered.  Doug, you make a lot of sense and making headway fast but you&#8217;re going the wrong direction.  Most conspiracy theories are a lot less fantastic than the official versions, which are highly improbable.  A few questions for you to ponder along these lines:  Re JFK, how unlikely are the &#8220;magic bullet&#8221; and &#8220;pristine bullet&#8221; theories promoted by the official Warren report?  Re RFK, how were more bullets fired than the assassin&#8217;s gun held?  Re MLK, How did James Earl Ray shoot MLK with a tree in the way, why was that tree removed by the Parks Department immediately afterwards, and how was he convicted without a ballistics test ever being done to determine whether or not the fatal bullet was even shot from his rifle?  Re Oklahoma City, how is it that the FBI bomb people just happened to check into town the night before the bombing, and why did they swear they didn&#8217;t get there until after the bombing?  Re 911, why did President Bush&#8217;s brother order the bomb-sniffing dogs removed from the building from 9/9 through 9/11; how is it that the plane that flew through the Pentagon made only a small hole in the wall; and why did the coroner who was first on the scene at the supposed crash site of Flight 93 found no bodies or airplane parts?  Re Columbine, why does the official version insist there were only two perpetrators when the students themselves saw others, and I saw a whole group in black trenchcoats arrested on the sceene on live TV?  Re Abraham Lincoln, how is it that John Wilkes Booth was identified by his broken leg (broken when he jumped out of Lincoln&#8217;s box onto the stage), but when he landed on the stage it was his OTHER leg that was broken?  It takes a lot more critical thinking to confront these discrepancies than to blindly believe whatever we are told.  And maybe somebody from eHarmony can tell me, if they&#8217;re a Christian site, why don&#8217;t they know that the All-seeing Eye of Horus is indeed an occult sysmbol?  I always heard that one of the primary purposes of public education was to cripple our ability to think for ourselves, and it&#8217;s easy to see that this is exactly what has happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.eharmony.com/blog/2011/04/25/%e2%80%a6and-he-believes-that-fluoride-in-the-water-is-a-government-attempt-at-mind-control-are-conspiracy-theories-a-deal-beaker/#comment-1882</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advice.eharmony.com/blog/?p=8276#comment-1882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People have a tendency to want to believe the more fantastic story when given a choice between something more realistic and the twisted version. It&#039;s a normal bias to go with the more interesting. I grew up with a lot of people who would believe that all you had to do to justify a story was to come up with a way it might have been possible no matter how unlikely the possibility.

The man simply lacks critical thinking skills that help counter the bias. Critical thinking isn&#039;t always something you are born with... it can be learned. I agree that he&#039;s being honest about his beliefs and maybe he shouldn&#039;t be judged so harshly...

The thing she needs to be concerned about is what will he believe when she&#039;s late coming home and she says &quot;The car ran out of gas and some gentlemen helped me.&quot; But his buddy suggests she was cheating on him. That&#039;s when he&#039;s really going to need to think critically. Even if she&#039;s always been completely honest with him, his tendency to believe the more fascinating story might lead to a ruined relationship.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People have a tendency to want to believe the more fantastic story when given a choice between something more realistic and the twisted version. It&#8217;s a normal bias to go with the more interesting. I grew up with a lot of people who would believe that all you had to do to justify a story was to come up with a way it might have been possible no matter how unlikely the possibility.</p>
<p>The man simply lacks critical thinking skills that help counter the bias. Critical thinking isn&#8217;t always something you are born with&#8230; it can be learned. I agree that he&#8217;s being honest about his beliefs and maybe he shouldn&#8217;t be judged so harshly&#8230;</p>
<p>The thing she needs to be concerned about is what will he believe when she&#8217;s late coming home and she says &#8220;The car ran out of gas and some gentlemen helped me.&#8221; But his buddy suggests she was cheating on him. That&#8217;s when he&#8217;s really going to need to think critically. Even if she&#8217;s always been completely honest with him, his tendency to believe the more fascinating story might lead to a ruined relationship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Masao</title>
		<link>http://www.eharmony.com/blog/2011/04/25/%e2%80%a6and-he-believes-that-fluoride-in-the-water-is-a-government-attempt-at-mind-control-are-conspiracy-theories-a-deal-beaker/#comment-1872</link>
		<dc:creator>Masao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 05:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advice.eharmony.com/blog/?p=8276#comment-1872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obviously, she should follow her heart.  It is interesting to note however that a man honest enough to express his beliefs (whatever their foundation) is cruelly ridiculed.  How often do we see the requirement of being an &#039;honest&#039; man and here one is...as an example of how not to be.  If you want to believe that the moon is made of green cheese or that 9/11 was just a boating accident, your honesty and sincerity should not be overlooked when you express your beliefs.  

This article should be far less judgemental about beliefs systems and more concerned about someone who cannot commit to accepting or rejecting those beliefs in an open and honest way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, she should follow her heart.  It is interesting to note however that a man honest enough to express his beliefs (whatever their foundation) is cruelly ridiculed.  How often do we see the requirement of being an &#8216;honest&#8217; man and here one is&#8230;as an example of how not to be.  If you want to believe that the moon is made of green cheese or that 9/11 was just a boating accident, your honesty and sincerity should not be overlooked when you express your beliefs.  </p>
<p>This article should be far less judgemental about beliefs systems and more concerned about someone who cannot commit to accepting or rejecting those beliefs in an open and honest way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crackers</title>
		<link>http://www.eharmony.com/blog/2011/04/25/%e2%80%a6and-he-believes-that-fluoride-in-the-water-is-a-government-attempt-at-mind-control-are-conspiracy-theories-a-deal-beaker/#comment-1859</link>
		<dc:creator>Crackers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 23:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advice.eharmony.com/blog/?p=8276#comment-1859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RUN, RUN, run away and don&#039;t look back. Clearly a nutter!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RUN, RUN, run away and don&#8217;t look back. Clearly a nutter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
